Strategies for Writing Good Answers
To excel in answering UPSC questions, candidates must exhibit a profound grasp of pertinent subjects and the capacity to dissect and reconcile conflicting socio-economic aspirations. UPSC seeks concise responses that offer pertinent insights and demonstrate analytical depth. Candidates are expected to present coherent perspectives on diverse issues while maintaining relevance and meaning in their answers. The emphasis lies on furnishing succinct yet substantial responses that encapsulate the essence of the question. Thus, mastering the art of writing good answers entails a blend of understanding, analysis, and clarity, aligning with UPSC's criteria for evaluating candidates' comprehension and articulation skills.
Tips for Writing Good Answers
Understanding the Question:
Writing Answer According to Directive Words:
Terminology |
Meaning and Demand of the directives/commands |
Discuss |
Write two or all aspects of an issue analytically without criticism. Conclude with a brief summary of all sides. |
Critically Discuss |
Similar to discuss but includes evaluation of pros and cons. Provide both positive and negative aspects systematically. |
Explain |
Describe the meaning and all aspects of the problem, addressing all 'why' questions. Write without criticism or personal opinion. |
Examine |
Scrutinize the statement/question, presenting both support and criticism. It requires evaluation based on certain criteria, indicating merits and demerits. |
Evaluate |
Write pros and cons of the given statement, offering a balanced view. |
Critically Evaluate |
Evaluate the statement/question and argue for its rejection, yet include positive aspects initially. Conclude with a decisive stance. |
Comment |
Analytically present different aspects of an issue or problem, including personal opinion. |
Critically Comment |
Evaluate and comment systematically on various aspects of the issue or problem. Provide a view after thorough evaluation. |
Analyse |
Provide an in-depth view of the given statement, examining underlying causes and dimensions. |
Critically Analyse |
Analyze underlying causes and interrelated aspects of the given phenomenon. Offer a detailed evaluation without simply criticizing. |
Describe |
Simply describe a phenomenon or statement without criticism or analysis, focusing on apparent features. |
Elaborate |
Expand the given statement/question substantially, providing detailed explanation without criticism. |
Elucidate |
Expand the statement/question with appropriate examples, without criticism, using diagrams or flow charts if necessary. |
Illustrate |
Explain with diagrammatic/figurative explanation, including diagrams or flow charts. |
Enumerate |
List the features or points about the given statement in order. |
Distinguish |
Write differences between two or more phenomena, distinguishing all aspects. |
Compare and Contrast |
Briefly present meanings of phenomena, then compare similarities and differences. Conclude by summarizing which aspects are more prominent. |
Substantiate |
Prove a particular proposition by presenting only positive aspects, convincing the examiner like a lawyer. |
Answer Structure and Presentation:
Copyright IAS. All rights reserved || Design & Developed By Edukit